- Gills: no
- Simpsons: yes
- Tesco: no
- Nose Hugs Surprizisity Score: 9.5/10 improving
- Day Score: 7/10
Thank yu to those hoo hav alreddy partisipaytid in my Important Pant Survey (see yestaday). I'll publish the final results on Friday, but this is how it looks so far:
- ankles: 0
- knees: 7
- no pants at all (I haddent even thort of this wun): 5
I just hope that those of yu hoo say yu don't wear eny pants decline to do so becos they share their living space with sum small enthewsiastic Bear hoo has nicked them all for a dam good frolicking, and not that yu are seveerly Pant-Deprived.
If yu ARE akchewally Pant-Deprived, this must mean that yor Bears are too, an as I warned Shrink-Wrapped, I can ownly urge yu to rektify this as soon as possibal, becos a Bored Small Pant-Deprived Bear can become "Difficult". I won't go into detail. Just be warned, that's all.
I waz shokt to read that so menny of yu out there are pantless. But then, Mummy confessed that she scarcely wor eny pants at all in the 1990s. (Wen Daddy sed he wished ha had met her sooner, I had NO IDEA this was wat he ment...) She sez she ownly startid to wear them agen wen she got a bit spongey rownd the middle, an needid an extra bit of stretchy cotton to hold things in. Well, it was that or giv up the choccie biccies, so hoo can blame her.
Vote soon if yu havent alreddy!
All this talk of pants has put me in the mood for a Dam Good Frolic. I'm off to find a Pant Drawer.... Bye fer now!